05 Sep

Our attempts to engage the House of Commons Treasury Select Committee in dialogue about sovereign money creation have failed to elicit any response, leaving us with no alternative but to continue the monologue by issuing them an ultimatum:

To the Rt. Hon. Mel Stride (Chairman), Mr Steve Baker MP, Mr Anthony Browne MP, Ms Angela Eagle MP, Ms Julie Marson MP, Ms Alison Thewliss MP, Ms Rushanara Ali MP, Ms Harriett Baldwin MP, Ms Felicity Buchan MP, Mr Mike Hill MP, and Ms. Siobhain McDonagh MP.

4th September 2020

Dear Member of Parliament,



On July 9th 2020, as a member of the Treasury Select Committee, you were sent an evidence-based and highly-detailed Formal Notice of Instruction.

It is not our intention in this letter to repeat everything again but to advise you, as our elected servants in Parliament, of the inevitable consequences of your collective refusal to respond or to comply in a rational way to a lawful and quite reasonable direction that is overwhelmingly in the public good.

As this Formal Notice of Instruction is based solely on the indisputable truth, common sense and proven historical facts, it comes fully under the remit of the Common Law.

To clarify what this means, we would like to remind you that our ancient and God-given Common Law takes absolute precedence over any agenda-driven and self-serving decisions arrived at by party-obedient politicians in Parliament.

This is particularly pertinent today as we witness some of our most senior elected servants in Parliament acting in support of moves towards establishing a global authoritarian technocracy as promoted and encouraged by the World Economic Forum.

From our detailed research and through talking to concerned and well-informed ‘insiders’, we have ascertained that the Great Reset, as it is now called, has been planned for many decades and that the final outcome will not be for the overall benevolence and well-being of humanity as a whole.

This Great Reset is modelled upon what has been termed The Green New Deal, an untested US experiment centred around the Fourth Industrial Revolution (authored by Klaus Schwab, the founder of the World Economic Forum) that seeks to steer humanity directly towards the deeply flawed vision advocated by Ray Kurzweil—known as transhumanism. It promotes UN Agenda 2030 and ‘sustainability’ by deliberately seeking to drive humanity towards living in centrally controlled and completely cashless habitation zones and cities, not dissimilar to the ones now being established in Communist China, whilst at the same time pushing to end traditional farming practices by ‘wilding’ large tracts of otherwise productive land. This fear-based vision of the future (using extremely questionable and bad science) is also dependent upon the untested telecom roll-out of 5G for the burgeoning Internet of Things which involves the ability to undertake highly-detailed and invasive 24/7 Orwellian surveillance of all people… including your good selves and, most importantly of all, your children and their children!

When another form of Coronavirus hit the UK during the winter of 2017/18 and around 50,000 people sadly died, the Government didn’t trash the economy and force tens of thousands of businesses to shed jobs or to go under whilst, at the same time, infringing upon our most essential and ancient freedoms. Yet this is precisely the action that has been undertaken by the present government. This so-called ‘COVID-19’ has been clearly politicised by those supporting this global agenda for a worldwide technocracy that will put to a complete end our sovereignty and our most basic of human liberties.

Those who meet annually at Davos under the guise of the World Economic Forum, along with the privately-controlled central bankers led by the virtually unknown Bank for International Settlements, all draw benefit from being involved with a completely fraudulent global financial system. A system that politicians continue to sustain even though it provably saddles the world with unlawful debt, contrived wars, economic slavery and abject poverty.

As you well know, our lawful Formal Notice of Instruction to you was about a proven, historical and successful fiscal arrangement, the 1914 Treasury-issued ‘Bradbury Pound’, that if restored today would check and completely take down this skewed financial system of private control and debt and so completely reverse this crippling and inhuman model of financial injustice. However, for whatever reason, you have chosen to completely ignore it.

Apart from the simple lack of courtesy, this can only sensibly be construed as a deliberate and direct refusal by yourselves to avoid acknowledging the existence of a common-sense fiscal arrangement which, if implemented again today, would not only save our country’s economy from increasing hardship and austerity but would ensure lasting prosperity by being free from the criminal interference of the private central bankers and those corporate megalomaniacs who meet annually in Davos.

Hardly a day goes by without news bulletins telling us that yet another high-profile corporate name has either gone into receivership or is shedding a large number of jobs. Tens of thousands of good and sound companies are experiencing extremely worrying times and millions of jobs and livelihoods are now at very real risk.

But despite this, the Treasury Select Committee has clearly turned its back on our Formal Notice of Lawful Instruction. Remember, this notice only required you, using your extensive access to the mainstream media, to publicly inform and educate the British people that there is a very real and proven alternative to just increasing the taxation burden whilst borrowing more interest-bearing debt from the private bankers—bankers who are adept in the dark art of creating money completely out of thin air. The latter is especially relevant as we are told that the Chancellor of the Exchequer is planning to borrow as much as £500 billion of new debt from the private financial sector.

The conclusion to all of this is simple. It is now abundantly clear that in Parliament today there is an orchestrated and conspiratorial cover-up to ensure that public knowledge about the best proven means of keeping the national economy solvent is kept secret.

This is extremely serious.

We now have to inform you that this abject refusal to inform the British nation about this proven fiscal arrangement of harnessing our national credit can only be viewed as a crime under the Common Law (see below for details). As public servants, you are clearly withholding from the British people the essential information and historical evidence they need to know so that they can engage in a meaningful way about this proven fiscal policy that will completely save our post-pandemic economy.

Please understand that if no meaningful reply is forthcoming from the Treasury Select Committee after one month from the date of this letter, we will be reluctantly compelled (and we do now have the resources and the means at our disposal to do this) to take steps to uphold the Law of the Land and so ensure that the proven truth is allowed to come out without further delay.

And it is this truth about what is ACTUALLY happening to our nation today that is starting to emerge. Last Saturday, over 30,000 ordinary but concerned people gathered peacefully in Trafalgar Square. In Berlin, well over one million have recently come out onto the streets and one of the key speakers last weekend was Robert F. Kennedy jnr., the nephew of the late US President, John F. Kennedy. Unfortunately, Germany has living memory of what fascism is really like and how it was allowed to gain traction!

So, the decision for you today is simple—which side are you on? Truth and freedom or lies and fascism? That is the blunt choice… all backed up by compelling evidence. To completely ignore us a third time will give us the clear answer.

Yours sincerely

Justin Walker

On behalf of:

Sir Julian Rose Bt.

Brian Gerrish

Eddy Alder

Sukh Gidda

Sandi Adams

David Laity

Gary Bashford

Michelle Young

Adrian Price

Michael Dunn

Alan Davies

David Pidcock

Oliver Perceval

Marcus Blackett

Louise Ashley

Jason Liosatos

William Keyte

Richard Carruthers

Christine Hyde

Jim Bonnell

John Briggs

Lucy Morgan Edwards

Hardwick Alliance for Real Ecology (website under construction)

The New Chartist Movement



Under English law, misconduct in public office is a criminal offence at common law which dates back to the 13th century.

The offence carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. It is confined to those who are public office holders, and is committed when the office holder acts (or neglects to act) in a way that constitutes a breach of the duties of that office.

The Crown Prosecution Service guidelines on this offence state that the elements of the offence are when:

  • A public officer acting as such.
  • Wilfully neglects to perform one's duty and/or wilfully misconducts oneself.
  • To such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public's trust in the office holder.
  • Without reasonable excuse or justification.


1.1 Selflessness: Holders of public office should act solely in terms of the public interest.

1.2 Integrity: Holders of public office must avoid placing themselves under any obligation to people or organisations that might try inappropriately to influence them in their work. They should not act or take decisions in order to gain financial or other material benefits for themselves, their family, or their friends. They must declare and resolve any interests and relationships.

1.3 Objectivity: Holders of public office must act and take decisions impartially, fairly and on merit, using the best evidence and without discrimination or bias.

1.4 Accountability: Holders of public office are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions and must submit themselves to the scrutiny necessary to ensure this.

1.5 Openness: Holders of public office should act and take decisions in an open and transparent manner. Information should not be withheld from the public unless there are clear and lawful reasons for so doing.

1.6 Honesty: Holders of public office should be truthful.

1.7 Leadership: Holders of public office should exhibit these principles in their own behaviour. They should actively promote and robustly support the principles and be willing to challenge poor behaviour wherever it occurs.